To challenge the science underpinning the greenhouse effect is widely perceived as an attack on motherhood and apple pie. But if the science presented is garbage, what other option is there?
We test the hypothesis that greenhouse gases cause the observed atmospheric temperature distribution by examining the null hypothesis; that the temperature distribution can be explained without reference to the greenhouse effect.
The null hypothesis is upheld, ergo the greenhouse effect theory is superfluous, and by Occam’s razor is discounted.
Help yourself to a copy.
Gordon Vigurs 